Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 376, Issue 9737, 24–30 July 2010, Pages 285-301
The Lancet

Series
Prevention of HIV infection for people who inject drugs: why individual, structural, and combination approaches are needed

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60742-8Get rights and content

Summary

HIV can spread rapidly between people who inject drugs (through injections and sexual transmission), and potentially the virus can pass to the wider community (by sexual transmission). Here, we summarise evidence on the effectiveness of individual-level approaches to prevention of HIV infection; review global and regional coverage of opioid substitution treatment, needle and syringe programmes, and antiretroviral treatment; model the effect of increased coverage and a combination of these three approaches on HIV transmission and prevalence in injecting drug users; and discuss evidence for structural-level interventions. Each intervention alone will achieve modest reductions in HIV transmission, and prevention of HIV transmission necessitates high-coverage and combined approaches. Social and structural changes are potentially beneficial components in a combined-intervention strategy, especially when scale-up is difficult or reductions in HIV transmission and injection risk are difficult to achieve. Although further evidence is needed on how to optimise combinations of interventions in different settings and epidemics, we know enough now about which actions are effective: the challenge is to deliver these well and to scale.

Introduction

In most world regions, HIV infection is concentrated in subsets of the population exposed to particular HIV transmission risks, such as people who inject drugs.1 Injecting drug use takes place in 151 countries,2 with an estimated 11–21 million such users in 2007, of whom 0·8–6·6 million were estimated to be living with HIV.3

HIV transmission is a risk for all populations of injecting drug users (IDUs), with potential for the virus to spread rapidly between those who inject drugs (via injections and sexual risk) and, possibly, to the wider community through sexual transmission.4 The risk of infection after injection with an HIV-contaminated syringe is estimated to be 0·63–2·4% (median 0·8%; around 1 in 125 injections),5 with a potentially lower, albeit not quantified, transmission risk from sharing other contaminated drug-use equipment. The risk of HIV transmission between HIV-positive IDUs and their sexual partners is estimated at 0·02–0·05%6, 7, 8 per heterosexual sex act (ie, 1 in 2000–5000 sex acts); the estimated risk per act of receptive anal intercourse between men is 0·82% (0·24–2·76%).9

Key messages

  • Opioid substitution therapy (OST), needle and syringe programmes (NSPs), and antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduce risks of HIV infection in injecting drug users (IDUs)

  • Individual-based and network-based psychosocial interventions can reduce injecting and sexual risk; people who inject drugs can play an important part in development and delivery of such responses

  • Augmented research and programme attention needs to be directed towards psychostimulant injectors, since proven pharmacotherapies for substitution do not exist as they do for opioids

  • Model projections suggest high coverage of ART, OST, and NSPs in combination are important for reduction of incidence of HIV infection in IDUs by more than 50%; very high intensity and coverage of single interventions is necessary to achieve similar effects; short-term, small-scale, single interventions are unlikely to be effective

  • Current coverage of interventions for injecting drug use is inadequate; annually worldwide, perhaps 5% of drug injections are covered by a sterile needle and syringe provided by an NSP; eight clients receive OST for every 100 IDUs (range 6–12); and four IDUs receive ART for every 100 HIV-positive IDUs (range 2–18)

  • Structural interventions might be needed when scale-up is difficult or when intervention efforts do not reduce injecting risk and transmission of HIV infection; an innovative evaluative evidence base is needed to understand the effect of structural interventions

  • Surveillance of the epidemic and response is crucial, but typically poor; studies of transmission of HIV infection and effects of interventions should have funding priority and be nested in ongoing surveillance programmes; evaluation of interventions should include cost-effectiveness studies

  • Limitations in evidence need not limit response; sufficient justification exists on human rights and public-health grounds for scaling up now; evidence-based prevention of HIV infection should be a policy priority in all countries where injecting drug use takes place

Here, we review evidence on interventions that avert injection-related HIV transmission, by either prevention of injections with HIV-contaminated equipment or reduction of HIV transmission when needle-sharing does take place. Some interventions aim to decrease the total number of injections, either by treatment of drug dependence or through efforts to dissuade people from drug use, by punishment (typically, incarceration). Other strategies aim specifically to reduce unsafe injections: provision of clean equipment; education to encourage individuals to inject drugs in a safe way; and facilities where people can inject safely (supervised injecting centres). Other approaches aim to lower the risk of sexual transmission, by provision of condoms, through behavioural interventions to encourage safe sexual practices, and by treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). By reducing viral load, antiretroviral treatment (ART) can diminish the likelihood of HIV transmission if exposure happens.

Our key outcome is prevention of HIV transmission in IDUs. First, we summarise evidence on the effectiveness of different individual-level approaches to prevention of HIV transmission. Second, we review coverage of three prevention interventions, regionally and globally. Third, we model the effect of increased coverage and combined interventions on HIV transmission and prevalence in IDUs. A range of countervailing contextual and cultural factors—so-called structural factors above the level of the individual, looked at in the first paper in this Series10—could affect both HIV risk and the capacity to deliver effective interventions.11 We discuss structural-level interventions that could increase intervention scale-up and boost community-level effects of risk reduction in IDUs.

Section snippets

Interventions targeting people who inject drugs

Table 1 details evidence of the effect of different interventions on various outcomes of interest (a glossary describing these strategies is in the webappendix p 5). The grades (A–D) describe the highest level of evidence available for the domains. Several points are salient. First, the strength of evidence varies across interventions. Second, at present, approaches with the greatest potential effect seem to be needle and syringe programmes (NSPs), opioid substitution treatment (OST), and ART.

Combined interventions in prevention

In reviews of prevention, researchers have noted that combinations of interventions are more likely to have an effect than single interventions;20, 103, 104 this finding is not surprising since no one approach addresses all outcomes of importance (injections, injection risk, sexual risk, and HIV infectivity; table 1). Accordingly, data from cohort and modelling studies have shown that the effects of NSPs and OST on HIV incidence in IDUs are negligible if delivered as stand-alone strategies.55,

Current intervention coverage

Measurement of the scale of interventions is a challenge and is inconsistent across countries and international agencies,114 and quality of data describing the epidemic and the response varies substantially (panel 3). We know, however, that NSPs, OST, and ART are being implemented in an increasing number of countries,1, 2, 115, 116 though with very large differences in coverage.

In a systematic review,2 researchers noted that NSPs had been introduced in 82 of 151 countries where injecting drug

Potential of social and structural interventions

Interventions operating at the population or community level are known as structural interventions.11, 103 As discussed in the first paper in this Series,10 social and structural factors can inhibit the capacity of IDUs to reduce their risk of HIV infection or diminish the extent to which prevention strategies are delivered and used.11, 118, 119 In circumstances when interventions have not been introduced or scale-up is inadequate, or when the effect of strategies on HIV transmission is limited

Improvement of HIV prevention for people who inject drugs

Prevention of HIV infection in IDUs is achievable. We know how HIV is transmitted, and we recognise a core set of strategies that can limit its spread. Model projections described here suggest not only that combination and increased coverage of interventions will prevent HIV transmission but also that high levels of coverage need to be sustained for long periods. The effect of these core strategies is greatest when background HIV prevalence is low. Therefore, delays to introduction and scale-up

Conclusions

Prevention of HIV infection needs high coverage and combined approaches. Single interventions, even at high coverage, are likely to achieve only modest reductions in HIV transmission, particularly in settings with very high levels of HIV risk behaviours. Governments, policy makers, and public-health officials must be engaged and convinced of the importance of scaling up. Further lines of evidence could assist in justification of rapid scale-up when resistance occurs, including evaluation of

Search strategy and selection criteria

We used several search strategies and focused wherever possible on identification of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. First, with respect to interventions to prevent HIV infection, we searched in: the Cochrane Library; the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (University of York); Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews; the Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews; DRUG; Global health; and Project Cork (tailored search terms for each database are described in detail in the

References (150)

  • JSG Montaner et al.

    The case for expanding access to highly active antiretroviral therapy to curb the growth of the HIV epidemic

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • 2008 report on the global AIDS epidemic

  • RF Baggaley et al.

    Risk of HIV-1 transmission for parenteral exposure and blood transfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    AIDS

    (2006)
  • B Marincovich et al.

    Absence of hepatitis C virus transmission in a prospective cohort of heterosexual serodiscordant couples

    Sex Transm Infect

    (2003)
  • M-A Pedraza et al.

    Heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 is associated with high plasma viral load levels and a positive viral isolation in the infected partner

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (1999)
  • E Vitinghoff et al.

    Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1999)
  • SA Strathdee et al.

    HIV and risk environment for injecting drug users: the past, present, and future

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • JA Denison et al.

    HIV voluntary counseling and testing and behavioral risk reduction in developing countries: a meta-analysis, 1990–2005

    AIDS Behav

    (2008)
  • CM Lyles et al.

    Best-evidence interventions: findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000–2004

    Am J Public Health

    (2007)
  • AR Elwy et al.

    Effectiveness of interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections and human immunodeficiency virus in heterosexual men: a systematic review

    Arch Intern Med

    (2002)
  • S Semaan et al.

    A meta-analysis of the effect of HIV prevention interventions on the sex behaviors of drug users in the United States

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (2002)
  • N Crepaz et al.

    Do prevention interventions reduce HIV risk behaviours among people living with HIV? A meta-analytic review of controlled trials

    AIDS

    (2006)
  • MD Stanton et al.

    Outcome, attrition, and family-couples treatment for drug abuse: a meta-analysis and review of the controlled, comparative studies

    Psychol Bull

    (1997)
  • N El-Bassel et al.

    Long-term effects of an HIV/STI sexual risk reduction intervention for heterosexual couples

    AIDS Behav

    (2005)
  • A Medley et al.

    Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    AIDS Educ Prev

    (2009)
  • H Tilson et al.

    Preventing HIV infection among injecting drug users in high-risk countries: an assessment of the evidence

    (2007)
  • N Palmateer et al.

    Evidence for the effectiveness of sterile injecting equipment provision in preventing hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus transmission among injecting drug users: a review of reviews

    Addiction

    (2010)
  • L Jones et al.

    A review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of needle and syringe programmes for injecting drug users

  • SC Weller et al.

    Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2002)
  • O Galárraga et al.

    HIV prevention cost-effectiveness: a systematic review

    BMC Public Health

    (2009)
  • L Gowing et al.

    Substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2008)
  • F Faggiano et al.

    Methadone maintenance at different dosages for opioid dependence

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2009)
  • RP Mattick et al.

    Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2009)
  • LE Sullivan et al.

    Decreasing international HIV transmission: the role of expanding access to opioid agonist therapies for injection drug users

    Addiction

    (2005)
  • P Lobmaier et al.

    Sustained-release naltrexone for opioid dependence

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2008)
  • S Minozzi et al.

    Oral naltrexone maintenance treatment for opioid dependence

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2006)
  • M Silva de Lima et al.

    Antidepressants for cocaine dependence

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2003)
  • B Soares et al.

    Dopamine agonists for cocaine dependence

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2003)
  • S Minozzi et al.

    Anticonvulsants for cocaine dependence

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2008)
  • WP Knapp et al.

    Psychosocial interventions for cocaine and psychostimulant amphetamines related disorders

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2007)
  • M Shahmanesh et al.

    Effectiveness of interventions for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in female sex workers in resource poor setting: a systematic review

    Trop Med Int Health

    (2008)
  • LE Manhart et al.

    Randomized controlled trials of individual-level, population-level, and multilevel interventions for preventing sexually transmitted infections: what has worked?

    J Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • P Vickerman et al.

    Are targeted HIV prevention activities cost-effective in high prevalence settings? Results from a sexually transmitted infection treatment project for sex workers in Johannesburg, South Africa

    Sex Transm Dis

    (2006)
  • S Attia et al.

    Sexual transmission of HIV according to viral load and antiretroviral therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

    AIDS

    (2009)
  • E Wood et al.

    Longitudinal community plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations and incidence of HIV-1 among injecting drug users: prospective cohort study

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • T Kerr et al.

    The role of safer injection facilities in the response to HIV/AIDS among injection drug users

    Curr HIV/AIDS Rep

    (2007)
  • D Hedrich

    European report on drug consumption rooms

  • AM Bayoumi et al.

    The cost-effectiveness of Vancouver's supervised injection facility

    CMAJ

    (2008)
  • Assessment of compulsory treatment of people who use drugs in Cambodia, China, Malaysia and Viet Nam: an application of selected human rights principles

  • R Pearshouse

    Compulsory drug treatment in Thailand: observations on the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act B.E. 2545 (2002)

  • Cited by (367)

    • HIV/AIDS Prevention

      2023, Manson's Tropical Diseases, Fourth Edition
    • Empfehlungen zur Hepatitis Versorgung bei Drogenkonsumierenden

      2023, International Journal of Drug Policy
    • Profiles and health risks (STIs, HCV, HIV) of injecting drug users

      2022, Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text