Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 388, Issue 10061, 3–9 December 2016, Pages 2775-2782
The Lancet

Articles
Effectiveness and impact of a reduced infant schedule of 4CMenB vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in England: a national observational cohort study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31921-3Get rights and content

Summary

Background

In September, 2015, the UK became the first country to introduce the multicomponent group B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine (4CMenB, Bexsero) into a publicly funded national immunisation programme. A reduced two-dose priming schedule was offered to infants at 2 months and 4 months, alongside an opportunistic catch-up for 3 month and 4 month olds. 4CMenB was predicted to protect against 73–88% of MenB strains. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and impact of 4CMenB in vaccine-eligible infants in England.

Methods

Public Health England (PHE) undertakes enhanced surveillance of meningococcal disease through a combination of clinical, public health, and laboratory reporting. Laboratory-confirmed cases of meningococcal disease are followed up with PHE local health protection teams, general practitioners, and hospital clinicians to collect demographic data, vaccination history, clinical presentation, and outcome. For cases diagnosed between Sept 1, 2015, and June 30, 2016, vaccine effectiveness was assessed using the screening method. Impact was assessed by comparing numbers of cases of MenB in vaccine-eligible children to equivalent cohorts in the previous 4 years and to cases in vaccine-ineligible children.

Findings

Coverage of 4CMenB in infants eligible for routine vaccination was high, achieving 95·5% for one dose and 88·6% for two doses by 6 months of age. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness was 82·9% (95% CI 24·1–95·2) against all MenB cases, equivalent to a vaccine effectiveness of 94·2% against the highest predicted MenB strain coverage of 88%. Compared with the prevaccine period, there was a 50% incidence rate ratio (IRR) reduction in MenB cases in the vaccine-eligible cohort (37 cases vs average 74 cases; IRR 0·50 [95% CI 0·36–0·71]; p=0·0001), irrespective of the infants’ vaccination status or predicted MenB strain coverage. Similar reductions were observed even after adjustment for disease trends in vaccine-eligible and vaccine-ineligible children.

Interpretation

The two-dose 4CMenB priming schedule was highly effective in preventing MenB disease in infants. Cases in vaccine-eligible infants halved in the first 10 months of the programme. While ongoing national surveillance will continue to monitor the longer-term impact of the programme, these findings represent a step forward in the battle against meningococcal disease and will help reassure that the vaccine protects against this deadly infection.

Funding

Public Health England.

Introduction

In September, 2015, the UK became the first country to introduce the multicomponent, protein-based meningococcal vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero, GSK, Rixensart, Belgium) into a national, publicly funded infant immunisation programme.1 The vaccine was offered to all infants born since July 1, 2015, at 2 months, 4 months, and 12 months alongside their routine immunisations. Catch-up vaccination was also opportunistically offered to 3 month and 4 month olds attending their routine immunisation visits, who were eligible for a 3-4-12 month and 4-12 month schedule, respectively.

Before introduction of 4CMenB, the UK immunisation schedule had included the group C meningococcal (MenC) conjugate vaccine since 1999.2 As an emergency response to a national outbreak of group W meningococcal (MenW) disease, 13–18 year olds and new university entrants have been offered the quadrivalent MenACWY conjugate vaccine since August, 2015.3 These conjugate vaccines target the polysaccharide capsule of meningococci and do not offer cross-protection against other meningococcal capsular groups, such as group B (MenB), which remains responsible for most cases of invasive meningococcal disease in the UK, especially in young children.1

Development of an effective conjugate vaccine against MenB has not been possible because its polysaccharide capsule is structurally homologous to glycoproteins in fetal neural cell adhesion molecules, making them poorly immunogenic self-antigens.4 4CMenB is a novel vaccine composed of three recombinant proteins—factor H-binding protein (fHbp), Neisserial heparin-binding antigen (NHBA), and Neisserial adhesin A (NadA)—and the outer membrane vesicles (OMV) from the New Zealand outbreak strain (NZ98/254), which incorporates the immunodominant Porin A (PorA) P1.4 protein.5 The vaccine was licensed in Europe in January, 2013, on the basis of immunogenicity and safety studies alone. 4CMenB induces high titres of bactericidal antibodies against the target vaccine antigens but, as yet, protection against invasive disease has not been shown.

Research in context

Evidence before this study

We searched PubMed with the terms “4CMenB”, “Bexsero”, “meningococcal serogroup B vaccine”, and any combination of “vaccine effectiveness” or “impact”. Publication dates and languages were not limited. Our search results identified no data for the vaccine effectiveness or impact of 4CMenB against invasive meningococcal group B (MenB) disease.

In January, 2013, 4CMenB was licensed in Europe on immunogenicity and safety studies only. The vaccine induces bactericidal antibodies that target the respective antigens, which could be absent or variably expressed on the surface of different meningococci. Because 4CMenB contains multiple recombinant proteins in addition to the outer membrane vesicle, antibody concentrations or bactericidal activity against individual vaccine antigens do not reliably predict in-vitro killing of meningococci. For this reason, the Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS) was developed to screen large numbers of meningococcal strains and predict whether they would be killed by 4CMenB-induced antibodies. MATS is a qualitative and quantitative ELISA that quantifies expression of the vaccine-associated antigens (fHbp, NHBA, and NadA) in combination with the ability of 4CMenB-induced antibodies to recognise these proteins on the surface of individual meningococcal isolates. For an isolate to be MATS positive, antibodies against at least one vaccine antigen must exceed the positive bactericidal threshold, which is assigned on the basis of killing using postvaccination sera from infants after their 12-month booster, or the isolate must possess homologous PorA (P1.4). In England and Wales, MATS predicted that 73% (95% CI 57–87%) of invasive MenB disease isolates in 2007–08 would be killed by vaccine-induced antibodies in infants. In a serum bactericidal antibody assay with human complement (hSBA), however, pooled sera from infants and adolescents immunised with 4CMenB killed 88% of a representative sample of MenB disease isolates from England and Wales during 2007–08. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, therefore, 4CMenB was predicted to protect against 73–88% of circulating MenB strains in the UK.

Compared with adolescents and adults, infants have lower cross-protection against MenB strains that are predicted by MATS to be non-vaccine preventable. Data from a recent university-associated MenB outbreak in the USA showed that sera from a third of 499 adolescents who received two doses of 4CMenB 10 weeks apart were unable to kill the outbreak strain using the hSBA assay, even though the outbreak strain was predicted by MATS to express two vaccine antigens.

Added value of this study

The UK is the first country to introduce 4CMenB into a publicly funded, national immunisation programme. In England, vaccine coverage was high in all eligible cohorts, reaching 95·5% for one dose and 88·6%% for two doses. During the first 10 months of the programme, two-dose vaccine effectiveness of 82·9% against all MenB disease was equivalent to a vaccine effectiveness of 94·2% against vaccine-preventable MenB strains. By the end of June, 2016, MenB cases in vaccine-eligible infants had halved, irrespective of the infants’ vaccination status or expected vaccine strain coverage.

Implication of all the available evidence

We have provided the first evidence of protection against group B meningococcal disease conferred by the novel, multicomponent 4CMenB vaccine in infants. While ongoing national surveillance will continue to monitor the longer-term impact of the programme, these findings represent a step forward in the battle against meningococcal disease and will help reassure that the vaccine protects against this deadly infection.

Other countries have been reluctant to introduce 4CMenB into their national programmes because of the high price of the vaccine and the low incidence of MenB, leading to unfavourable health economic assessments, as well as uncertainties around strain coverage, vaccine safety, and effectiveness.6, 7, 8, 9 In March, 2014, the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) concluded that 4CMenB could be cost-effective,10 with a reduced two-dose infant priming schedule.11 After a year of negotiation with the vaccine manufacturer, an infant immunisation programme with 4CMenB was announced in March, 2015,12 and the first infants were vaccinated on Sept 1, 2015. Here, we report the first estimates of effectiveness and the early impact of the programme in England.

Section snippets

Case ascertainment and follow-up

Public Health England (PHE) undertakes enhanced national surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in England through a combination of clinical, public health, and laboratory reporting. The PHE Meningococcal Reference Unit (MRU) provides a national service for confirming, grouping, and characterising invasive meningococcal isolates.13 The MRU also provides free PCR testing of clinical samples from patients with suspected invasive meningococcal disease across England. Consequently, case

Results

In England, introduction of 4CMenB rapidly achieved high vaccine coverage; in the routine cohort, vaccine coverage by birth month ranged between 94·8–95·5% for one dose and 84·8–88·6% for two doses by 6 months of age (figure 1; appendix p 2). Coverage for the catch-up cohort born in June, 2015, was 88·8% for one dose and 75·2% for two doses, and, for the May, 2015, cohort, was 76·6% for the single dose that they were eligible for.

Between Sept 1, 2015, and June 30, 2016 (10 months), 55 cases of

Discussion

A reduced two-dose infant priming schedule of the novel, multicomponent, protein-based 4CMenB vaccine was 82·9% effective in preventing MenB disease in infants aged younger than 12 months. During the first 10 months of the programme, cases of MenB halved in vaccine-eligible infants, providing further evidence of vaccine efficacy. This measure of impact does not take into account the vaccination status of the infants or whether the infecting MenB strain was vaccine preventable. The findings are

References (25)

  • G Vernikos et al.

    Bexsero(R) chronicle

    Pathog Glob Health

    (2014)
  • H Yamashiro et al.

    The role of pediatricians as key stakeholders in influencing immunization policy decisions for the introduction of meningitis B vaccine in Canada: The Ontario perspective

    Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol

    (2015)
  • Cited by (228)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text