Road safety effects of porous asphalt: a systematic review of evaluation studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of studies that have evaluated the effects on road safety of porous asphalt. Porous asphalt is widely used on motorways in Europe, mainly in order to reduce traffic noise and increase road capacity. A meta-analysis was made of six studies, containing a total of eighteen estimates of the effect of porous asphalt on accident rates. No clear effect on road safety of porous asphalt was found. All summary estimates of effect indicated very small changes in accident rates and very few were statistically significant at conventional levels. Studies that have evaluated the effects of porous asphalt on nine different risk factors associated with accident occurrence were also reviewed. It was found that four of the risk factors were favourably influenced by porous asphalt, three were adversely influenced, and two were not influenced by porous asphalt. The net impact of these changes in risk factors on accident occurrence cannot be predicted. On the whole, the research that has been reported so far regarding road safety effects of porous asphalt is inconclusive. The studies are not of high quality and the findings are inconsistent.

Introduction

Porous asphalt is used in many European countries, mainly in order to reduce traffic noise and increase road capacity. Porous asphalt differs from ordinary dense asphalt concrete by having an open structure with approximately 20–25% air filled pores. The open structure of porous asphalt reduces traffic noise, drains water from the road surface and reduces thermal conductivity.

As part of a European research project (SILVIA = Silenda Via = Sustainable Road Surfaces for Traffic Noise Control), a systematic review has been made of studies that have evaluated the effects of porous asphalt on road safety. The objective of this paper is to present the results of that systematic review. The main questions that were asked in the review were:

  • 1.

    What are the effects on road safety of porous road surfaces?

  • 2.

    Do the effects on road safety of porous road surfaces vary according to accident severity and road surface condition?

  • 3.

    Do the effects on road safety of porous road surfaces vary across countries?

  • 4.

    How long do the effects on road safety of porous road surfaces last?

In order to answer these questions, studies that have evaluated the effects of porous asphalt on accident occurrence and on risk factors associated with accident occurrence have been reviewed (Elvik and Greibe, 2003).

Section snippets

Study retrieval

A search was made for relevant studies in the TRANSPORT literature database using the combination of “road safety” and “road surfaces” as search terms. This literature database contains all references found in TRIS, IRRD and TRANSDOC. In addition, a previous literature review (Greibe, 2000) was used as a source. A total of 16 studies that have evaluated effects on accidents of road surface treatments, and that have been published after 1990, were retrieved. Porous asphalt was not widely used

Findings of evaluation studies

The six studies that were included in the systematic review of effects on accidents are listed in Table 2. A total of 18 estimates of effect were extracted from these six studies. Details regarding the extraction of estimates of effect from each study can be found in the main report (Elvik and Greibe, 2003). All studies stated effects in terms of the accident rate ratio:accident rate ratio=number of accidents on roads with porous asphalt/kilometres of driving on roads with porous asphaltnumber

Discussion and interpretation

A distinction is sometimes made between two ways of interpreting the results of research: (1) Methodological, and (2) Substantive. A methodological interpretation of research usually criticises the research by pointing out flaws in research methods. In this paper, the methodological point of view is represented by the quality assessment made of studies that have evaluated the effects on accidents of porous road surfaces. A formal quality scoring system has been used. According to this system,

References (21)

  • J.B. Edwards

    Motorway speed in wet weather: the comparative influence of porous and conventional asphalt surfacings

    J. Transport Geogr.

    (2002)
  • R. Elvik

    The importance of confounding in observational before-and-after studies of road safety measures

    Accident Anal. Prevent.

    (2002)
  • Bendtsen, H., Larsen, L.E., Greibe, P., 2002. Udvikling af støjreducerende vejbelægninger til bygader, Statusrapport...
  • J. Bonnot

    French experiences of porous asphalt

  • M.C. Brailly

    Porous macadam and road safety

  • Commandeur, J.J.F., Bijleveld, F.D., Braimaister, L.G., Janssen, S.T.M.C., 2002. De analyse van ongeval-, weg-, en...
  • Delanne, Y., Laganier, R., Christophe, T., Gondoni, N., Duboil, C., Begou, P.A., 1991. Skid resistance of drainage...
  • S. Duval et al.

    Trim and fill: a simple funnel plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis

    Biometrics

    (2000)
  • Elvik, R., Greibe, P., 2003. Safety aspects related to low noise road surfaces. Report 680. Institute of Transport...
  • R. Elvik et al.

    Handbook of Road Safety Measures

    (2004)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (40)

  • Phyto-based sodium chloride hydrogel for highway winter maintenance of porous asphalt pavements

    2022, Construction and Building Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Regardless of the construction technique, the enhanced effectiveness for stormwater management results in several safety and environmental benefits. These kind of pavements can minimize hydroplaning potential by improving the wet pavement frictional resistance and reduce water splash and spray, nighttime surface glare in wet conditions and tire-pavement noise [19–21]. But despite these inherent advantages, the open-graded layout and surface macro-texture of porous asphalt pavements affect their thermo-hygrometric regime at low temperatures, as well as the management of winter maintenance operations [22].

  • Evaluation of the benefits of open graded friction course: Case study

    2018, Construction and Building Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Hernandez-Saenz et al. [13] asserted that these safety-related benefits were the main reason for using OGFC mixtures in the United States. However, some studies challenged that the safety effectiveness of OGFC was limited and inconclusive [14,15]. They claimed that the road user usually drives faster on OGFC surfaced pavements, which might result in a higher accident rate as compared to the conventional pavements.

  • Study of the porous asphalt performance with cellulosic fibres

    2017, Construction and Building Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    The porous asphalt can be applied both in conventional pavements with impermeable base layer, and also in permeable pavements with a fully constituted structure by porous layers [10–13]. In addition to the effects associated to surface runoff improvement, the application of these mixtures allows the decrease of the urban heat island effect, reduce the tires noise, the surface runoff and, consequently, the spray effect and aquaplaning, leading to a safer driving [14–16]. Noise reduction is also improved by the increase of porous asphalt air voids content with the help of the aggregates optimized sieve line [17,18].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text