Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Factors: How Can We Improve Outcomes in the High-Risk Patient?
Section snippets
Global Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment: A Guide for Therapy
In 2001 the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) incorporated a risk assessment algorithm for ASCVD. Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), other atherosclerotic disease, or diabetes are considered to be at high risk. For other patients, risk stratification occurs in 2 steps. First, for the purpose of cholesterol management, the clinician counts the number of major risk factors. In this case only 5 major risk factors apply: cigarette smoking,
The Metabolic Syndrome
In 2001, the ATP III introduced the metabolic syndrome as a clinically useful description of a commonly observed clustering of metabolic risk factors, including atherogenic dyslipidemia (e.g., high triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol), elevated blood pressure, elevated plasma glucose, a prothrombotic state, and a proinflammatory state.2, 5, 6 According to ATP III,1 a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome can be made when ≥3 of 5 metabolic risk factors are present in an individual patient (Table 2).
Modifying Risk Factors
Lifestyle change is the first-line approach to the management of patients at high cardiovascular and metabolic risk. The therapeutic goal is to reduce underlying cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors such as overweight/obesity, physical inactivity, and atherogenic diet. Successful incorporation of healthy eating and fitness habits into a patient’s lifestyle can reduce every metabolic risk factor (Table 3).7 For patients at higher risk, specific lipid and metabolic risk factors are targets
A Risk Group–Guided Approach to Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management
Various management approaches are recommended for each of the different risk group categories of moderate risk, moderately high risk, high risk, and very high risk, as well as for the metabolic syndrome. In general, therapy intensifies with increasing level of risk. However, therapeutic lifestyle changes (e.g., smoking cessation, weight reduction, and “heart-healthy” dietary modifications) and blood pressure control are recommended across all categories of risk.
Summary
In clinical practice, risk assessment is a valuable guide to optimizing outcomes in the settings of both primary and secondary prevention. In general, risk modification therapy should be “stepped up” according to risk category. Patients at high or very high risk should receive intensive intervention for risk reduction. For example, it is reasonable to treat very-high-risk patients to an LDL cholesterol goal of <70 mg/dL. However, at all levels of risk, therapeutic lifestyle changes (e.g.,
References (18)
Metabolic syndrome: connecting and reconciling cardiovascular and diabetes worlds
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006)Hypertriglyceridemia, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and the metabolic syndrome
Am J Cardiol
(1998)- et al.
Reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome: analysis of the Treating to New Targets study
Lancet
(2006) Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
JAMA
(2001)- et al.
Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association Conference on scientific issues related to definition
Circulation
(2004) - et al.
AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Circulation
(2006) Diabetes and coronary risk equivalency: what does it mean?
Diabetes Care
(2006)- et al.
Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement
Circulation
(2005) - et al.
Effect of lowering LDL cholesterol substantially below currently recommended levels inpatients with coronary heart disease and diabetes: the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study
Diabetes Care
(2006)
Cited by (40)
Agreement between Results of Home Sleep Testing for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with and Without a Sleep Specialist
2016, American Journal of MedicineMetabolic Syndrome
2015, Endocrinology: Adult and PediatricPrevalence and factors associated with metabolic syndrome in users of primary healthcare units in São Paulo - SP, Brazil
2012, Revista da Associacao Medica BrasileiraMetabolic syndrome and hepatic resection: Improving outcome
2011, HPBCitation Excerpt :These data suggest that irinotecan and oxaliplatin probably affect progression but not the development of steatosis. MetS increases the risk for advanced NAFLD and CVD suggesting that potential candidates for hepatic resection should be screened for the presence of MetS and the optimization of surgical outcome in this particularly high-risk subset of patients will require a multidisciplinary effort to treat individual components of MetS and NAFLD in consultation with a cardiologist and hepatologist.111-113 The primary goal in the management of MetS is the reduction in the risk of clinical atherosclerotic disease.114
Weight control and prevention of metabolic syndrome by green tea
2011, Pharmacological ResearchCitation Excerpt :Despite these advances, there are still several risks associated with pharmacological and surgical intervention of obesity and the metabolic syndrome, suggesting that dietary modification may be the safest and most cost-effective option for those who are moderately obese [10–12]. To date, nutritional intervention is still the preferred method of treatment and prevention for obesity and the metabolic syndrome [9,13]. Tea (Camellia sinensis, Theaceae) is the second popular beverage in the world, next to water.
Hostility, metabolic syndrome, inflammation and cardiac control in young adults: The Young Finns Study
2011, Biological PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Hostile individuals are known to report poorer lifestyle habits such as sedentary lifestyles, smoking, and heavy alcohol consumption, than others (Pulkki et al., 2003; Siegler et al., 1992). These behaviors, in turn, increase the risk for developing the metabolic syndrome (Eckel et al., 2005; Grundy, 2007) and systemic inflammation (Koenig et al., 2007). Another possible mechanism between hostility, metabolic syndrome and CRP involves bodily dysfunctions in autonomic nervous systems’ ability to control heart rate (autonomic cardiac control).