Differences in perceived risks and benefits of herbal, over-the-counter conventional, and prescribed conventional, medicines, and the implications of this for the safe and effective use of herbal products
Introduction
The sale and use of herbal medicines has increased significantly over the past 20 years. Eisenberg et al.,1 for example, reported that use of herbal medicines in the US increased from 2.5% in 1990 to 12.1% in 1997, with a total of $ 5 billion being spent. Within the UK, Thomas et al.2 found that over 30% of a random sample of 5010 adults were taking, or had been taking, herbal remedies. Despite this increase in usage, and the concurrent increase in the amount of information promoting usage, there are still relatively few studies that have examined people's beliefs about the risks and benefits of herbal products, particularly as a distinct medicine type (rather than asking about complementary medicines in general). Thus, the majority of studies in the area have compared experiences with, and views about, complementary as opposed to orthodox medicines.3, 4, 5, 6 Such general comparisons, however, make it more difficult to address a number of key questions.
For example, one reason for the increased usage of complementary, including herbal, medicines is that such products are believed to be safer than orthodox treatments,7, 8, 9, 10 but it is not clear from the existing studies what underlies this perception. Thus, are herbal medicines perceived to be safe because they are more readily available, or for some other reason, such as their being a more natural product? In relation to this, Tomassoni and Simone11 proposed that the over the counter availability of herbal medicines fosters the notion that they are safe. The present study compares people's views about the risks and benefits of herbal, over-the-counter (OTC) conventional, and prescribed conventional medicines. This should provide a more thorough understanding of people's views of the relative safety of the three medicine types, as well as what might underlie any differences in perceptions.
There is also evidence that people do not inform their physicians if they are taking complementary medicines.7, 12, 13, 14 Eisenberg et al. found that of the 34% of respondents who reported using at least one complementary therapy in the past year, 72% did not inform their doctor. More recently, Bennett and Brown found that the majority of users (86%) did not discuss their use of herbal remedies with their doctor. The evidence on this is mixed, however. Klepser et al. reported that both users and non-users of herbal therapies indicated that they would disclose such information if asked by doctors and pharmacists (although the study did not assess whether such information would be volunteered spontaneously). In addition, Harnack et al.15 reported that 89% of their sample of 376 US respondents agreed with the statement “you should inform your physician of any herbal products you are taking”.
A related question concerns whether people would consult their doctor if they experience an adverse side effect as a result of taking a herbal product. It has been reported that many people do not associate adverse reactions with herbal products they are taking, as they believe the products are safe. As a result, many do not inform their doctors when they experience a reaction. Barnes et al.16 found that patients were less likely to report adverse reactions resulting from use of a herbal product compared with a prescription drug.
Experiment 1 in the present study specifically compares people's views about the risks (adverse side effects, dependency, interaction with prescribed medicines) and benefits of herbal, over-the-counter (OTC) conventional, and prescribed conventional medicines in order to gain a better understanding of people's views of the relative safety of the three medicine types, as well as what might underlie any differences in perceptions. Thus, herbal medicines may be seen to differ from OTC and prescribed (conventional) medicines because they are seen as being more natural. Alternatively, herbal and OTC medicines may differ from prescribed medicines because the former two are more easily available and can be self-prescribed. Experiment 2 looks at how likely it is that people would take a herbal or OTC product in addition to a prescribed medicine, whether they would seek advice in advance of doing this (and from what source), and what action they would take if they experienced an adverse effect.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants (Experiment 1, n = 77; Experiment 2, n = 120) were adult members of the general population, recruited as opportunity samples in a London coach station. For Experiment 1, this took place on weekdays in October 2003 and, for Experiment 2, in December 2003. Further details of the samples are provided in the results sections.
Design
In Experiment 1, a one factor (medicine type: prescribed, OTC, herbal) within-participant design was used; that is, all participants answered questions relating to the
Experiment 1
Participants (30 males; 47 females) were aged between 18 and 70. They had a range of educational backgrounds (from having no formal qualifications to a higher degree) and occupations (including teachers, shop assistants, and office and manual workers, as well as some being retired and unemployed). The vast majority had English as their first language, and the remainder spoke it to a high level of proficiency. Thirty-two participants (42%) reported having used herbal medicines in the past year,
Discussion
In line with previous studies,7, 10, 18 our experiments provide support for the position that herbal medicines are seen as being safer than conventional (prescribed or OTC) medicines. In particular, they are seen as being less likely to give rise to adverse side effects, to interact with other medicines, and to lead to dependency. Furthermore, our findings suggest that herbal medicines are not perceived as being safer than prescribed medicines simply because of their easier availability; rather
References (21)
- et al.
Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey
Complem Ther Med
(2001) - et al.
An exploratory qualitative study to investigate how patients evaluate complementary and conventional medicine
Complem Ther Med
(2002) - et al.
Use of herbal remedies by patients in a Health Maintenance Organization
J Am Pharmacists Assoc
(2000) Herbal medicine
Complem Altern Med
(2002)- et al.
Results of a population-based survey of adults’ attitudes and beliefs about herbal products
J Am Pharmacists Assoc
(2003) Herb drug interactions
Lancet
(2000)- et al.
Provision of information about drug side-effects to patients
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997
J Am Med Assoc
(1998) - et al.
Patients’ opinions about complementary medicine
Res Complem Med
(1997) - et al.
The perceived efficacy and risk of complementary and alternative medicine and conventional medicine: a vignette study
J Appl Biobehav Res
(2001)
Cited by (104)
DNA barcoding and metabarcoding for quality control of botanicals and derived herbal products
2022, Evidence-Based Validation of Herbal Medicine: Translational Research on BotanicalsRole of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Management of Cancer Cachexia
2021, Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology NursingMetabarcoding reveals low fidelity and presence of toxic species in short chain-of-commercialization of herbal products
2021, Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisAddressing Chemophobia: Informational versus affect-based approaches
2020, Food and Chemical Toxicology