Review
A systematic review of the effectiveness and roles of advanced practice nursing in older people

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To identify, assess and summarize available scientific evidence about the effect of interventions deployed by advanced practice nurses when providing care to older people in different care settings, and to describe the roles and components of the interventions developed by these professionals.

Background

In older people, evidence of advanced practice roles remains dispersed along different contexts, approaches and settings; there is little synthesis of evidence, and it is not easy to visualize the different practice models, their components, and their impact.

Data sources

Sixteen electronic databases were consulted (1990–2014). The research also included screening of original studies in reviews and reports from Centers of Health Services Research and Health Technology Agencies.

Review methods

Studies were assessed by two reviewers with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. They were classified depending on the type of follow-up (long and short-term care) and the scope of the service (advanced practice nurses interventions focused on multimorbid patients, or focused on a specific disease).

Results

Fifteen studies were included. In long-term settings, integrative, multi-component and continuous advanced practice nursing care, reduced readmissions, and increased patients’ and caregivers’ satisfaction. Advanced practice nurses were integrated within multidisciplinary teams and the main interventions deployed were patient education, multidimensional assessments and coordination of multiple providers.

Conclusion

Positive results have been found in older people in long-term care settings, although it is difficult to discern the specific effect attributable to them because they are inserted in multidisciplinary teams. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the two modalities detected and to compare internationally the interventions developed by advanced practice nurses.

Introduction

The Association des Infirmières et Infirmiers du Canada (AIIC) (2008), defines advanced practice nursing (APN), as “an advanced level of nursing practice that maximizes the use of specialized skills and nursing knowledge in order to respond to the customers’ needs in the health sphere”. In the United States, the introduction of these nursing roles with a high level of autonomy, dates back to the mid-1960s, whereas in Canada, those roles were introduced in the 1970s (Martin-Misener et al., 2010), but in many other countries they are irregularly developed. Many of these initiatives were launched to fulfill gaps in services traditionally carried out by physicians (DiCenso et al., 2010), in order to improve access to care, particularly in under-served areas (Delamaire and Lafortune, 2010), and as a consequence to the reduction of physicians workforce internationally (Dowling et al., 2013, Olson and Chioffi, 2005, Por, 2008). Despite this expansion, advanced practice roles are still difficult to define precisely because the term encloses a heterogeneous variety of practices, usually associated to local circumstances belonging to the setting where they are developed (Gardner et al., 2007).

Section snippets

Background

In recent years, use of APN has been widely extended in several countries. Their roles can be distinguished from basic practice through their level of specialization, advancement, and role expansion (Dowling et al., 2013). They usually integrate research, training, practice, and management (Bryant-Lukosius et al., 2004). They tend to develop a high degree of professional autonomy, with their own caseload of patients, advanced skills for health status assessment and decision-making or diagnostic

Aims

The aims of this SR were to identify, assess and summarize available scientific evidence about the effect of interventions deployed by APNs when providing care to older people in different settings (hospital, home, outpatient, residential) as well as to describe the roles and components of the interventions developed by these professionals.

Design

The study consisted of a systematic review, whose protocol was registered in PROSPERO and published elsewhere (Morilla-Herrera et al., 2013).

Search methods

The databases consulted were: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsychINFO, ENFISPO, COCHRANE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (incl. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, DARE), Joanna Briggs Institute, Centre for Review and Dissemination, HEN (EuroWHO), MEDLINE, EMI, CUIDEN, DIALNET, SCOPUS, and SCIELO. The search also included papers, reviews, and evaluations from the following research health services centers and Health Technology Agencies: INAHTA, Agency for Health Care Research and

Selection of studies

In the first stage of the review, a detailed double blinded assessment of titles and abstracts was performed by two independent reviewers to determine whether each item met the pre-determined requirements for inclusion. If this step was not clear, the full text of the article was evaluated.

Two blinded reviewers evaluated the full text of the references potentially eligible to assess whether they met the inclusion criteria for review. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion and the

Data abstraction

Data gathered from each study were methods, interventions, participants, results under consideration, and the reviewer's observations. When the original studies failed to provide necessary data for extraction, the authors were contacted for clarification or requesting the original data if possible. Studies were classified according to the following criteria: composition of the care team, contexts where the service was provided, and type of diseases.

Quality appraisal

Two reviewers conducted this process independently. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool included in RevMan 5. The biases assessed were: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, attrition bias, selective reporting and other bias. Each criteria could be high, low or unclear risk.

Synthesis

The performance of a meta-analysis was considered but, due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, this possibility was discarded. This heterogeneity was related to differences in follow-up periods and outcomes among studies and, consequently, we summarized the findings narratively rather than through statistics using meta-analysis.

Results

The search produced 2692 papers, including duplicates. Fig. 2 reflects the study selection process. After removing duplicates and screening, 1880 studies were eliminated, due to exclusion criteria, language, and date of publication. Finally, fifteen studies met the inclusion and quality criteria (Fig. 1). The excluded studies and the reasons for exclusion are detailed in the supplementary files.

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to determine the models and effectiveness of APN developed for the care of older people over 65 years old in different settings in terms of types of treated patients, deployed interventions, and outcomes achieved.

The main features identified in the studies concerning APNs’ role in all the contexts were: high level of professional autonomy, case management, advanced skills for assessment, diagnosis and decision-making, consultancy to other team members or

Limitations

Although our intention was to describe models of care among multiple environments, based on the interventions developed by APNs in different health settings, due to the reduced amount of articles in AC and HospC (one in each setting), it was only possible to illustrate APNs’ models of care in HC and TC. Nevertheless, this could be explained by the rigorous criteria employed in terms of quality appraisal for the studies included in the review. The heterogeneity of the included studies prevented

Conclusion

We have found two ways of implementing APN services for older people in different care settings: on one hand, a disease-oriented model that uses evidence-based interventions to control risks and complications; on the other hand, a generalist model focused on improving the autonomy of patients with multiple conditions. In both cases, APN services are linked to positive results in older people, above all in long-term care settings, although in the majority of studies the APN is a member of a

References (65)

  • C.M. Callahan et al.

    Effectiveness of collaborative care for older adults with Alzheimer disease in primary care: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • N.C. Campbell et al.

    Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

    BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.)

    (2007)
  • D.L. Carroll et al.

    The effects of a collaborative peer advisor/advanced practice nurse intervention: cardiac rehabilitation participation and rehospitalization in older adults after a cardiac event

    J. Cardiovasc. Nurs.

    (2007)
  • A.M. Chang et al.

    Advanced practice nursing role development: factor analysis of a modified role delineation tool

    J. Adv. Nurs.

    (2012)
  • A.M. Clark et al.

    A meta-analysis of randomized control trials of home-based secondary prevention programs for coronary artery disease

    Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil.

    (2010)
  • S.R. Counsell et al.

    Geriatric care management for low-income seniors: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • M. Delamaire et al.

    Nurses in Advanced Roles: A Description and Evaluation of Experiences in 12 Developed Countries

    (2010)
  • A. DiCenso et al.

    Utilization of nurse practitioners to increase patient access to primary healthcare in Canada—thinking outside the box

    Nurs. Leadersh. (Tor Ont)

    (2010)
  • F. Donald et al.

    A systematic review of the effectiveness of advanced practice nurses in long-term care

    J. Adv. Nurs.

    (2013)
  • M. Dowling et al.

    Advanced practice nursing: a concept analysis

    Int. J. Nurs. Pract.

    (2013)
  • J.R. Duffy et al.

    Improving outcomes for older adults with heart failure: a randomized trial using a theory-guided nursing intervention

    J. Nurs. Care Qual.

    (2010)
  • K. Eklun et al.

    Outcomes of coordinated and integrated interventions targeting frail elderly people: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

    Health Soc. Care Community

    (2009)
  • C.R. Elley et al.

    Effectiveness of a falls-and-fracture nurse coordinator to reduce falls: a randomized, controlled trial of at-risk older adults

    J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.

    (2008)
  • C. Fitzgerald et al.

    Advanced practice nursing education: challenges and strategies

    Nurs. Res. Pract.

    (2012)
  • G. Gardner et al.

    Making nursing work: breaking through the role confusion of advanced practice nursing

    J. Adv. Nurs.

    (2007)
  • G. Gardner et al.

    Delineating the practice profile of advanced practice nursing: a cross-sectional survey using the modified strong model of advanced practice

    J. Adv. Nurs.

    (2013)
  • L.D. Gillespie et al.

    Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community

    Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.

    (2012)
  • R.D. Griffiths et al.

    Is tap water a safe alternative to normal saline for wound irrigation in the community setting?

    J. Wound Care

    (2001)
  • R. Hébert et al.

    Impact of PRISMA, a coordination-type integrated service delivery system for frail older people in Quebec (Canada): a quasi-experimental study

    J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.

    (2010)
  • B. Hordam et al.

    Nursing intervention by telephone interviews of patients aged over 65 years after total hip replacement improves health status: a randomised clinical trial

    Scand. J. Caring Sci.

    (2010)
  • T.T. Huang et al.

    A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a discharge planning intervention in hospitalized elders with hip fracture due to falling

    J. Clin. Nurs.

    (2005)
  • A. Huss et al.

    Multidimensional preventive home visit programs for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    J. Gerontol. Ser. A: Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (78)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text