Original articleA systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up
Section snippets
Data sources
We conducted searches on the MEDLINE database (January 1966 to July 2003), the Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry (as of July 2003), as well as CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, and PsycInfo (all as of July 2003). Search terms used included: (smok* OR cigarette* OR tobacco) AND (school* OR class* OR teach*) AND (adolescen* OR minor OR student* OR child* OR teen* OR girl OR boy OR juvenile*). All searches were limited to randomized controlled trials. In addition, the bibliographies of relevant review
Results of literature search
The online MEDLINE search yielded 255 articles. Searches of CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, and PsycINFO yielded 9,270 articles. No additional studies were located from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry or the Medical Editors Trial Amnesty. The most common reasons for exclusion were that follow-up was inadequate or the study was not randomized. Eight studies met all inclusion criteria [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32].
Characteristics of included studies
There were variations in study populations, type and intensity of
Discussion
Few randomized controlled studies have evaluated the long-term impact of school-based smoking prevention programs rigorously. Among the 8 studies we analyzed, only 1 showed statistically significant results, suggesting that school-based intervention effects resulted in decreased monthly smoking prevalence at 12th grade or age 18 [25]. It is possible that the Life Skills Program is effective and others are not because it used a relatively high degree of interaction and participation. Because
Conclusion
Based on the available data in 1999, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended a comprehensive tobacco control program [64] that included a school-based component. In addition, Congress mandated that schools seeking Title IV funds use research-based prevention programs. Despite this, as shown in this systematic review, there is little evidence to suggest that existing programs produce long-term decreases in smoking prevalence.
Acknowledgments
Supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The opinions are those of the authors and not the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
The authors wish to thank the authors of the 8 studies included in this review for making available unpublished data from their research. The authors also wish to thank Richard E. Wiehe for his thoughtful review of the manuscript and Thomas D. Koepsell, MD, MPH, for his assistance with data interpretation and analysis.
References (64)
Longitudinal patterns of tobacco smoking from childhood to middle age
Addict Behav
(1999)- et al.
Project Towards No Drug Abusegeneralizability to a general high school sample
Prev Med
(2001) - et al.
Seven-year follow-up of a smoking-prevention program for children
Aust J Public Health
(1994) - et al.
One-year outcomes of Project Towards No Drug Abuse
Prev Med
(1998) - et al.
The effectiveness of drug abuse resistance education (Project DARE)5-year follow-up results
Prev Med
(1996) Preventing drug abuse in schoolssocial and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors
Addict Behav
(2000)- et al.
The change-in-stage and updated smoking status results from a cluster-randomized trial of smoking prevention and cessation using the transtheoretical model among British adolescents
Prev Med
(2001) - et al.
A randomized controlled trial of two primary school intervention strategies to prevent early onset tobacco smoking
Drug Alcohol Depend
(2002) - et al.
Outcome evaluation of a high school smoking reduction intervention based on extracurricular activities
Prev Med
(2002) - et al.
Taxation, regulation, and addictiona demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence
J Health Econ
(1993)