ReviewEfficacy of Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Section snippets
Data Sources and Searches
A computerized literature search was performed in the databases Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1966 through September 2013. The following key words were used: ACP; advance directives; end-of-life communication; life-sustaining treatment preferences; end-of-life decision making; and living will. The key words were combined using ‘or.’ In addition, reference lists of selected articles were searched by hand to identify relevant articles that may have been
Results
In total, 26,628 articles were found in the electronic searches. Fifty-six studies were identified (Table 1). These studies included patients with different diseases and were published between 1992 and 2012 (Figure 1). Fifteen studies (26.8%) recruited participants from an inpatient setting; 37 studies (66.1%) from an outpatient setting; and 4 studies (7.1%) from both settings.
Key Findings
This review systematically evaluated the efficacy of ACP interventions in different adult populations. Interventions focusing on advance directives as well as interventions that also included communication about ACP increased the completion of advance directives and the occurrence of end-of-life care discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. Moreover, interventions that also included communication about ACP in addition to advance directives, also improved concordance between
Methodological Considerations
Included trials had several limitations. First, 55.4% of the trials were classified as “low-quality trials.” The most important reason for low PEDro-scores was the lack of blinding of patients, therapists, and assessors. This may have influenced the findings of the included trials. Indeed, if patients and therapists are not blinded there is a greater risk of response bias and intervention bias, respectively.82 Other highly prevalent limitations were a lack of intention to treat and concealed
Conclusions
In line with our hypothesis, we conclude that ACP interventions increase the completion of advance directives, the occurrence of discussions about end-of-life care preferences, and the concordance between patient's preferences and end-of-life care received in different adult populations. Moreover, ACP interventions are likely to improve other outcomes for patients and their loved ones, such as quality of communication. Further, there seems to be no detrimental effect on anxiety, depression, and
Acknowledgments
All authors were involved in the conception and design of the study and the interpretation of data. Three authors were responsible for the analysis and drafting of the article. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published, had full access to all data in the study, and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. One author is guarantor.
References (88)
- et al.
A call for high-quality advance care planning in outpatients with severe COPD or chronic heart failure
Chest
(2011) - et al.
PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy
Manual Ther
(2000) - et al.
Effects of offering advance directives on quality adjusted life expectancy and psychological well-being among ill adults
J Clin Epidemiol
(1994) - et al.
Improving completion of advance directives in the primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial
Am J Med
(2004) - et al.
Peer mentoring: A culturally sensitive approach to end-of-life planning for long-term dialysis patients
Am J Kidney Dis
(2005) - et al.
Using video images to improve the accuracy of surrogate decision-making: A randomized controlled trial
J Am Med Dir Assoc
(2009) - et al.
A randomized trial to improve communication about end-of-life care among patients with COPD
Chest
(2012) - et al.
Patient-centered advance care planning in special patient populations: A pilot study
J Prof Nurs
(2004) - et al.
Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: Effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment
J Crit Care
(1998) - et al.
Effects of an intervention to improve communication about end-of-life care among African Americans with chronic kidney disease
Appl Nurs Res
(2010)
Predicting changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among patients with advanced chronic organ failure
Chest
Barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication for patients with COPD
Chest
Enhancing patient-professional communication about end-of-life issues in life-limiting conditions: A critical review of the literature
J Pain Symptom Manage
Blinding in randomised trials: Hiding who got what
Lancet
The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature
J Clin Epidemiol
What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?
J Clin Epidemiol
Bioethics for clinicians: 6. Advance care planning
CMAJ
Advance care planning in COPD
Respirology
Advance care planning in COPD: Care versus “code status.”
Chron Respir Dis
How well do we care for patients with end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparison of palliative care and quality of life in COPD and lung cancer
Thorax
A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care
N Engl J Med
Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs
Ann Intern Med
The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: Randomised controlled trial
BMJ
Psychiatric advance directives
J Psychiatr Pract
Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions
Phys Ther
Advance directives and proxies' predictions about patients' treatment preferences
Nurs Ethics
Effectiveness of computer-generated reminders for increasing discussions about advance directives and completion of advance directive forms. A randomized, controlled trial
Ann Intern Med
Advance directives as acts of communication: A randomized controlled trial
Arch Intern Med
Use of video to facilitate end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer: A randomized controlled trial
J Clin Oncol
Effect of an educational program on medical students' conversations with patients about advance directives: A randomized trial
J Gen Intern Med
Knowledge and experience with Alzheimer's disease. Relationship to resuscitation preference
Arch Fam Med
Increasing the use of advance directives in medical outpatients
J Gen Intern Med
Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes: A randomized controlled trial
JAMA
Systematic implementation of an advance health care directive in the community
Can J Nurs Adm
Promoting completion of health care proxies following hospitalization. A randomized controlled trial in a community hospital
Arch Intern Med
Promoting the use of advance directives. An empirical study
Arch Fam Med
Increasing the completion of the durable power of attorney for health care. A randomized, controlled trial
JAMA
Empowerment of the older patient? A randomized, controlled trial to increase discussion and use of advance directives
J Am Geriatr Soc
Impact of advance directive videotape on patient comprehension and treatment preferences
Arch Fam Med
Life-sustaining treatment preferences of hemodialysis patients: Implications for advance directives
J Am Soc Nephrol
The HIV-specific advance directive
J Gen Intern Med
Elderly outpatients respond favorably to a physician-initiated advance directive discussion
J Am Board Fam Pract
Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice
J Gen Intern Med
Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: Randomised controlled trial
BMJ
Cited by (0)
The authors have no conflicts of interest relating to this article. This project was supported by Grant 3.4.12.022 of Lung Foundation Netherlands, Leusden, The Netherlands. No funding source had any role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.