Elsevier

Public Health

Volume 185, August 2020, Pages 202-208
Public Health

Original Research
Development and validation of the Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning persons

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • It is necessary to measure the barriers lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) people experience when exercising.

  • The 'Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for LGBTQ+ persons' is valid and reliable.

  • This instrument is useful for developing interventions to encourage physically active lifestyles among LGBTQ+ people.

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study was to develop the Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning (BPASQ-LGBTQ+ [encompassing all spectrums of sexuality and gender]) persons (LGBT), which measures barriers using a socio-ecological model, and to validate it through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Study design

Validation study.

Methods

First, content validity was achieved by (a) developing a bank of items, (b) discussing the adequacy of the items in a committee of experts and classifying the selected ones under three socio-ecological levels (intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental) and (c) refining wording and relevance of the items after a pilot test. Second, 709 LGBTQ+ persons completed the questionnaire online to establish construct validity, criterion validity and internal consistency.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis revealed four underlying factors in the BPASQ-LGBTQ+, thus suggesting that the items initially considered as ‘environmental barriers’ could be constituting two separate factors based on social interactions or organizational aspects. Competing three- and four-factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The four-factor structure with two different factors accounting for environmental barriers obtained better values in all fit indices. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.745 to 0.813. Participants engaging in regular physical activity and sports reported lower scores in all the barriers subscales than their counterparts.

Conclusion

The BPASQ-LGBTQ+ is valid and reliable to measure barriers to physical activity and sports in LGBTQ+ people across the different socio-ecological levels. It could be especially useful for understanding the complex relationships between these barriers, which is of great relevance for the design and implementation of interventions addressed to encourage physically active lifestyles among LGBTQ+ people.

Introduction

Physical activity and sport (PAS) is nowadays a public health concern owing to its potential biological and psychosocial benefits.1,2 These positive outcomes can be especially relevant for populations at high risk of social exclusion because they generally have worse health than the general population.3,4 Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning (LGBTQ+ [encompassing all spectrums of sexuality and gender]) people are a socially excluded group owing to the oppression and structural violence they suffer.5, 6, 7 Although a full spectrum of identities is grouped within this LGBTQ+ umbrella term, hierarchies, differences and nuances of oppression that can affect differently their PAS practice cannot be neglected to develop more accurate PAS policies.8 However, the majority of the literature regarding this topic emphasizes that, as a result of this violence, all subgroups present higher prevalence of mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, stress and suicide attempts, as well as a higher risk of developing psychosis or other severe mental illnesses, than the general population.9, 10, 11 PAS developed in a safe context could thus be particularly beneficial to LGBTQ+ people's health and well-being because different psychological benefits such as increased self-confidence and self-esteem have been demonstrated for this population.12,13

However, LGBTQ+ people's PAS engagement is usually lower than the general recommended levels for adults' health.14,15 This dominant trend is especially pronounced among lesbians and transgender women.7,16 Therefore, developing and implementing PAS promotion programs addressed to this population should be a priority of public health policies. For these programs to be effective, knowledge on the barriers preventing LGBTQ+ people from participating in PAS is crucial. Some studies emphasize that the identification of general population– and lesbian-specific barriers17 enables the development of interventions designed to help these women to overcome the main barriers they face and increase their physical activity.18 Research shows that sufficiently active lesbians and gays experience fewer barriers to PAS than insufficiently active peers.19,20

The international literature has identified several barriers to PAS experienced by LGBTQ+ people, with homophobia, biphobia and transphobia being the most pervasive ones.21,22 Particularly, a study developed with non-heterosexual participants from English-speaking countries reported that 54% of gay men and 48% of lesbian women personally suffered from homophobia in sports domains, while 60% of bisexual men and 29% of bisexual women faced it.22 In a recent European study developed among LGBTQ+ people, 82% of participants had witnessed homophobia/biphobia/transphobia, and non-binary transgender and non-identifying people witnessed the most usages of homophobic/biphobic/transphobic language.21,23

Perception of unsafety, discrimination, negative experiences and lack of confidence have been also found to hinder PAS participation in this population.11,14,21,22 The fear of being discriminated in this context stopped them from making their sexuality visible, and between 74% and 81% of LGBTQ+ respondents were completely or partially in the closet in their sports centres owing to this fear.11,21,22 Stereotypes and expectations of success are also deterrents for non-active lesbians to engage in sports, while conceptions about gays' weakness and non-athletic behaviour may lead them not to be involved in PAS.7,19 Sexism and gender binarism have also been identified as relevant barriers because dealing with ‘boys’ and ‘girls’ sports is often challenging for LGBTQ+ communities, especially for non-binary transgender people who find a limited range of sports available according to gender labelling.11 In this regard, strict legal requirements to participate in competitive sports and communal changing rooms and showers have been found especially discouraging for transgender persons as well.21,24, 25, 26, 27

However, although several barriers to PAS have been identified for the LGBTQ+ communities,20,28 there is a lack of studies addressing this topic from a multilevel approach in which the relations and interactions between these barriers are considered. Socio-ecological models could be especially relevant in this regard. Although several and slightly different socio-ecological models have been proposed in the field of health promotion,29, 30, 31 the main tenets defining all of them are as follows: (a) human behaviour results from the interaction between different factors emerging from different levels of influence, and (b) the levels of influence are expected to affect each other, so that changes in one level could cause a knock-on effect on the others. Socio-ecological models thus provide a proper framework to understand LGBTQ+ people's PAS behaviours because they go beyond individual-level theories by considering all the factors involved at other levels (e.g., social, environmental), as well as their interactions.27

Nevertheless, although socio-ecological models have been widely used in the field of health promotion in many different populations, few studies focusing on LGBTQ+ people's health have adopted this approach. One of them, focused on the lesbian population, has identified specific barriers to PAS in each level of influence, such as public disclosure, lack of others' acceptance and lack of fitness facilities, among others.17 However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies before have developed and validated an instrument capable of measuring barriers to PAS experienced by LGBTQ+ people across the different socio-ecological levels. Therefore, the aim of this work was twofold: (a) to elaborate a questionnaire on the barriers to PAS experienced by LGBTQ+ people using a socio-ecological model (Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Questionnaire for LGBTQ+ persons [BPASQ-LGBTQ+]) and (b) to validate the BPASQ-LGBTQ+ through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Section snippets

Questionnaire development

Different procedures were carried out to achieve content validity of the questionnaire. First, an extensive literature review was conducted by four members of the study team to develop a bank of items reflecting on barriers to PAS that could be relevant for LGBTQ+ communities. It was early developed around the research on transgender people's PAS participation, area in which the team had some years of experience, and later completed with research on LGBTQ+ people's PAS participation. In both

Domain identification and scores

An EFA using principal axis factoring extraction and Promax rotation with Kaiser normalization was conducted. A preliminary EFA showed that two items (‘Fear of getting injured or harm your health while engaging in PAS’ and ‘Lack of free time’) did not fit these criteria and were thus excluded from subsequent analyses. After a second EFA, four factors accounting for 51.1% of the total item variance were extracted (see Table 2).

Although the questionnaire was theoretically based on three

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to develop and validate a questionnaire for measuring barriers to PAS in LGBTQ+ people using a socio-ecological approach. Having an instrument that is capable of capturing barriers within the different socio-ecological levels is of great relevance, given that people interact with their environments in complex ways when trying to be physically active. The study thus makes a relevant contribution to the field of LGBTQ+ people's health

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants and associations for their collaboration in this study.

Ethical approval

The participants gave their informed consent to participate in the study, and the Ethics Committee of the Universitat de València approved the materials and procedures used.

Funding

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References (47)

  • V. Pérez-Samaniego et al.

    Experiences of trans persons in physical activity and sport: a qualitative meta-synthesis

    Sport Manage Rev

    (2019)
  • S. Stringhini et al.

    Socioeconomic status and the 25× 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women

    Lancet

    (2017)
  • A. Bauman et al.

    The health benefits of physical activity in developing countries

    (2005)
  • World Health Organization (WHO)

    Global recommendations on physical activity for health

    (2010)
  • C. Morgan et al.

    Social exclusion and mental health. Conceptual and methodological review

    Brit J Psychiat

    (2007)
  • A. van Bergen et al.

    The association between social exclusion or inclusion and health in EU and OECD countries: a systematic review

    Eur J Public Health

    (2018)
  • J. Kidd et al.

    Transgender and transsexual identities: the next strange fruit—hate crimes, violence, and genocide against the global trans communities

    J Hate Stud

    (2010)
  • L. Puche et al.

    Adolescentes transexuales en la escuela. Aproximación cualitativa y propuestas de intervención desde la perspectiva antropológica [Transgender teenagers in school. Qualitative approach and proposals for intervention from an anthropological perspective]

  • S.S.C. Herrick et al.

    A systematic scoping review of engagement in physical activity among LGBTQ+ adults

    J Phys Activ Health

    (2018)
  • S.S.C. Herrick et al.

    A qualitative exploration of LGBTQ+ and intersecting identities within physical activity contexts

    J Sport Exerc Psychol

    (2018)
  • T.C. Carmel et al.

    Mental health and the transgender population

    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv

    (2016)
  • S.A. Kidd et al.

    Severe mental illness in LGBT populations: a scoping review

    Psychiatr Serv

    (2016)
  • C.M. Symons et al.

    The impacts of discriminatory experiences on lesbian, gay and bisexual people in sport

    Ann Leis Res

    (2017)
  • V. Krane et al.

    Social psychological benefits of gay games participation: a social identity theory explanation

    J Appl Sport Psychol

    (2002)
  • E. Coleman et al.

    Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7

    Int J Transgenderism

    (2012)
  • National Union of Students (Nus)

    Out in Sport. LGTB student's experiences in Sport

    (2012)
  • National LGBT Partnership

    LGBT people and physical activity: what you need to know

    (2016)
  • E. López-Cañada et al.

    Physical activity and sport in trans persons before and after gender disclosure: prevalence, frequency, and type of activities

    J Phys Act Health

    (2020)
  • D.R. Brittain et al.

    Barriers to moderate physical activity in adult lesbians

    Women Health

    (2006)
  • D.R. Brittain et al.

    BE-PALS: An innovative theory-based intervention to promote moderate physical activity among adult lesbians

    WSPAJ

    (2014)
  • D.R. Brittain et al.

    Perceived barriers to physical activity among adult lesbians

    WSPAJ

    (2008)
  • M.A. Cary et al.

    Barriers to physical activity among gay men

    Am J Men's Health

    (2016)
  • M. Smith et al.

    Out for sport: Tackling transphobia in sport. Transgender specific Companion report

    (2012)
  • Cited by (4)

    • LGBTQ people in physical activity and sport in Spain: Research, sport policy, and inclusion

      2022, Sport, Identity and Inclusion in Europe: The Experiences of LGBTQ People in Sport
    View full text