Elsevier

Women and Birth

Volume 26, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages 76-81
Women and Birth

Pregnancy as public property: The experience of couples following diagnosis of a foetal anomaly

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.05.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Pregnant women find themselves subject to comments and questions from people in public areas. Normally, becoming ‘public property’ is considered friendly and is relatively easy for pregnant women to deal with. However, following diagnosis of a foetal anomaly, the experience of being public property can exacerbate the emotional turmoil experienced by couples. Original research question: What is the experience of couples who continue pregnancy following the diagnosis of a foetal anomaly?

Method

The study used an interpretive design informed by Merleau-Ponty and this paper reports on a subset of findings. Thirty-one interviews with pregnant women and their partners were undertaken following the diagnosis of a serious or lethal foetal anomaly. Women were between 25 and 38 weeks gestation at the time of their first interview. The non-directive interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and the transcripts were thematically analysed.

Findings

A prominent theme that emerged during data analysis was that pregnancy is embodied therefore physically evident and ‘public’. Women found it difficult to deal with being public property when the foetus had a serious or lethal anomaly. Some women avoided social situations; others did not disclose the foetal condition but gave minimal or avoidant answers to minimise distress to themselves and others. The male participants were not visibly pregnant and they could continue life in public without being subject to the public's gaze, but they were very aware and concerned about its impact on their partner.

Conclusion

The public tend to assume that pregnancy is normal and will produce a healthy baby. This becomes problematic for women who have a foetus with an anomaly. Women use strategies to help them cope with becoming public property during pregnancy. Midwives can play an important role in reducing the negative consequences of a woman becoming public property following the diagnosis of a foetal anomaly.

Introduction

As a naïve and excited student nurse touring my training hospital, I encountered a woman in labour and said ‘What a beautiful day to have a baby’. She looked at me, a beaming 18-year-old straight from high school, and said ‘My baby is dead’. I had no idea that birth and death could occur together. This mortifying and unforgettable event coupled with later experience as a midwife, led me to wonder how people assume pregnancy will result in a healthy baby. I also wondered why strangers feel free to comment on a women's pregnancy, in essence, treating her like public property. This paper explores how couples experience becoming public property after diagnosis of a serious or lethal foetal anomaly and in essence, articulates part of the answer to the overarching research question; what is the experience of couples who continue pregnancy following the diagnosis of a foetal anomaly?

Section snippets

Literature review

In keeping with the nature of phenomenological studies, the review process was guided by integrative methods1 which allow for inclusion of experimental and non experimental research, theoretical and empirical literature. Multiple databases were used in the search process using the keywords, pregnancy (and variances) combined with public, property, midwifery and embodiment.

The search yielded feminist and sociological research articles and commentaries on the female body as a foetal vessel

Methodology and method

The philosophical foundation of this study is Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology which outlines the embodied nature of human perception.16 This means a person is influenced and shaped by culture, society and interactions between self and others. Hence, Merleau-Ponty argues that bracketing, the suspending of the researchers views, emotions and backgrounds is impossible.17, 18, 19 Using bracketing would breach the tenets of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology and align with the reductive ideology of

Findings

Four themes emerged during data analysis and this paper will focus on the first theme, becoming public property. Pseudonyms have been used to protect participant's privacy.

Becoming public property: ‘People treat you like public property

While consideration shown to pregnant women can be touching, comments on a woman's behaviour are hurtful if a woman is already feeling guilt and self-blame for not producing a ‘perfect’ baby:

People treat you like public property…yesterday I had two ladies let me skip in front of them to use the bathroom…I have people smile at me when I’m walking through public places. You get the other side where…if you get a coffee they assume that you’re uninformed and irresponsible. Bridgette

Shared humanity

The assumption of a healthy baby: ‘People are so excited when they see a pregnant woman

The world is directly known and experienced with each person having their own perceptions, history and beliefs.16 People assume that the pregnancy is normal and are taken by surprise when told the truth, and this added to participants’ distress. It is probable that when people discover there is a foetal anomaly they are worried about what to say and are also frightened that this could happen to them:

People are so excited when they see a pregnant woman and they know there's going to be a new

Embodiment and disembodiment: ‘He's not the one pregnant

For women, pregnancy is embodied; the foetus is always present and in late pregnancy, this presence is evident to others. For males, pregnancy is disembodied and experienced through their female partners. Tara expressed the consequences of embodiment and disembodiment:

He's not the one pregnant, so he could go outand they don’t even question anything, whereas I go out and my clients, they’re like ‘Oh you’re pregnantand it's sooo hard causemost of the time it is very nice when someone comments

Responding to the public gaze: ‘It's not like you go around telling everybody

The profoundness of life is tied up with relationships and the words and actions of others have the capacity to inflict pain. For participants, it was difficult to decide what to say and how to respond to questions regarding due date, gender and preparations for pregnancy:

Every day, every day‘Oh, how are you doing? You must be so excited’it is just an everyday reminder and then you struggle with ‘Okay, do I tell them? Do I not?’ Anna

Often a minimal response was given:

If it's total strangers,

Discussion

For women, being treated as public property was a traumatic experience. In contrast, their male partners described feeling guilty because they could go out without being treated like public property. Pregnancy is embodied for women and therefore visible. Alternately, for men the pregnancy was disembodied, invisible and experienced vicariously.

Humanity exists in a shared world where interactions are laden with meaning21 and influenced by social norms.9, 10 People become exposed and vulnerable

Recommendations

Continuity of care by a known midwife is ideal and benefits women as well as men.29, 30 Women are empowered by midwives who see and feel with them on their journey.31 Therefore midwives are ideally placed to provide supportive care for couples after diagnosis of a foetal anomaly.32, 33 Midwives can advise women and their partners about strategies to help reduce the negative impact of becoming public property. One strategy is for parents to inform a key person who becomes the main point of

Conclusion

It is common for pregnant women to be treated as public property and this has positive as well as negative aspects. Special consideration may be given to women who are pregnant. However, serious negative consequences occur when women are subject to condemnation if their behaviours do not fit socially constructed norms, exacerbating concerns that they may have somehow caused the foetal anomaly. For couples in this study, becoming public property and the general assumption that pregnancy will

References (33)

  • H. Dahlen et al.

    Birth centres and the national maternity services review: response to consumer demand or compromise?

    Women and Birth

    (2011)
  • I. Hildingsson et al.

    Fathers’ birth experience in relation to midwifery care

    Women and Birth

    (2011)
  • J. Fenwick et al.

    Providing perinatal loss care: satisfying and dissatisfying aspects for midwives

    Women and Birth

    (2007)
  • R. Whittemore et al.

    The integrative review: updated methodology

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2005)
  • L. Bailey

    Gender shows: first-time mothers and embodied selves

    Gender and Society

    (2001)
  • S. D’Enbeau et al.

    Caregiving and female embodiment: scrutinizing (professional) female bodies in media, academe, and the neighbourhood bar

    Women and Language

    (2010)
  • A. Elvey

    The material given: bodies, pregnant bodies and earth

    Australian Feminist Studies

    (2003)
  • R. Fox et al.

    ‘I don’t think it was such an issue back then’: changing experiences of pregnancy across two generations of women in south-east England

    Gender, Place and Culture

    (2009)
  • R. Longhurst

    ‘Corporeographies’ of pregnancy: ‘bikini babes’

    Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

    (2000)
  • J.P. Paff Ogle et al.

    Watching over baby: expectant parenthood and the duty to be well

    Sociological Inquiry

    (2011)
  • L. Rubin et al.

    Self-objectification and pregnancy: are body functionality dimensions protective?

    Sex Roles

    (2011)
  • S.K. Carter

    Gender performances during labour and birth in the midwives model of care

    Gend Issues

    (2009)
  • J.J. Popiel

    Making mothers: the advice genre and the domestic ideal 1760–1830

    Journal of Family History

    (2004)
  • J. Bainbridge

    Unsolicited advice: a rite of passage through your first pregnancy

    British Journal of Midwifery

    (2006)
  • A. Roush et al.

    Perinatal hospice

    Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews

    (2007)
  • L.S. Chitty et al.

    Continuing with pregnancy after a diagnosis of lethal abnormality: experience of five couples and recommendations for management

    British Medical Journal

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text