La revisión por pares: ¿buena, mala o todo contrario?

Plasència, A.; García, A.; Fernández, E.

doi:10.1016/S0213-9111(01)71590-7

Gaceta Sanitaria

ISSN: 0213-9111

Gaceta Sanitaria is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS).

Gaceta Sanitaria accepts and publishes articles in Spanish and English. It is an open access journal. All of its articles are freely available without charge and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence.

Convocatoria abierta y permanente para incorporar Editores/as asociados/as al Comité Editorial de Gaceta Sanitaria

Open and permanent call to incorporate Associate Editors to the Editorial Committee of Gaceta Sanitaria

Indexed in:

Scopus, Medline, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), SNIP

Impact factor

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years.

© Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2025

Impact factor 2024

1.5

Citescore

CiteScore measures average citations received per document published.

Citescore 2024

4.7

SJR

SRJ is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and qualitative measure of the journal's impact.

SJR 2024

0.521

SNIP

SNIP measures contextual citation impact by wighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.

SNIP 2024

1.006

Time to first decision

The median number of days it takes for an article to go from submission to first editorial decision.

Time to first decision

4 days

View more metrics

Open Access Option

Journal Information

Previous article | Next article

Vol. 15. Issue 5.

Pages 373-476 (August - October 2001)

La revisión por pares: ¿buena, mala o todo contrario?

Peer-review: good, bad or quite the reverse?

Visits

8281

Download PDF

A. Plasència, A. García, E. Fernández, por el Equipo Editorial

This item has received

8281 Visits

Article information

Bibliography

Download PDF

Statistics

Full text is only available in PDF

Biblografía

[1.]

García AM, Plasència A, Fernández E, on behalf of the Editorial Board of Gaceta Sanitaria. Reviewing peer reviews: the experience of a Public Health journal. Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Barcelona, 14-15 de septiembre de 2001; 38. Disponible en http://www.jama-peer.org/.

[2.]

Peer review in health sciences,

[3.]

Arnau C, Cobo E, Cardellach F, Ribera JM, Selva A, Urrutia A et al. Effect of statistical review on manuscript quality in Medicina Clínica. Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Barcelona, 14-15 de septiembre de 2001; 6. Disponible en http://www.jama-peer.org/

[4.]

Historial prepublicación de: Strauss B, King W, Ley A, Hoey J. A prospective study of rural drinking water quality and acute gastrointestinal illness. BMC Public Health 2001; 1: 8 (29 de agosto de 2001). Disponible en http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/backmatter/1471-2458-1-6-b1.pdf

[5.]

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Disponible en http://www.icmje.org/

[6.]

F. Davidoff, C.D. DeAngelis, J.M. Drazen, J. Hoey, L. Højgaard, R. Horton, et al.

Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.

N Engl J Med, 345 (2001), pp. 825-827

http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMed010093 | Medline

[7.]

A. Plasència.

Gigantes y enanos en el mercado de las revistas biomédicas: en la diversidad está el conocimiento.

Quark, 16 (1999), pp. 64-68

[8.]

M. Susser.

Authors and authorship—reform or abolition.